Skip to Content
Main content

ELMIRA HEIGHTS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

164

37%

LEVEL 2

171

38%

LEVEL 3

78

17%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

160

42%

LEVEL 2

128

34%

LEVEL 3

73

19%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

67

30%

LEVEL 2

86

39%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

59

33%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

97

43%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

101

50%

LEVEL 2

61

30%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

145

36%

LEVEL 2

162

40%

LEVEL 3

67

17%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

144

42%

LEVEL 2

116

34%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

104

28%

LEVEL 2

160

42%

LEVEL 3

77

20%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

111

34%

LEVEL 2

124

38%

LEVEL 3

72

22%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

60

83%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

49

91%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

58

27%

LEVEL 2

91

42%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

52

30%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

106

45%

LEVEL 2

80

34%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

108

52%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.