Skip to Content
Main content

THOMAS K BEECHER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

200

51%

LEVEL 2

137

35%

LEVEL 3

43

11%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

189

51%

LEVEL 2

131

36%

LEVEL 3

34

9%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

81

44%

LEVEL 2

69

38%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

81

44%

LEVEL 2

67

36%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

119

57%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

16

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

11
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

108

59%

LEVEL 2

64

35%

LEVEL 3

8

4%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

21

60%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

24

59%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

106

47%

LEVEL 2

74

33%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

105

48%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

65

58%

LEVEL 2

43

38%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

52

60%

LEVEL 2

30

35%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

169

48%

LEVEL 2

133

38%

LEVEL 3

43

12%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

158

48%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

33

10%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

31

84%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

31

89%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

34

37%

LEVEL 2

38

41%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

39

41%

LEVEL 2

35

36%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

166

56%

LEVEL 2

99

33%

LEVEL 3

28

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

150

55%

LEVEL 2

96

35%

LEVEL 3

19

7%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.