Skip to Content
Main content

FREDONIA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

122

34%

LEVEL 2

139

39%

LEVEL 3

65

18%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

73

38%

LEVEL 2

65

34%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

49

29%

LEVEL 2

61

36%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

19

24%

LEVEL 2

35

45%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

73

39%

LEVEL 2

78

41%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

54

47%

LEVEL 2

30

26%

LEVEL 3

23

20%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

90

30%

LEVEL 2

129

43%

LEVEL 3

55

18%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

52
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

56

34%

LEVEL 2

55

34%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

21

60%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

88

28%

LEVEL 2

135

42%

LEVEL 3

65

20%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

45

27%

LEVEL 2

64

39%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

34

89%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

28

97%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

95
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

115

33%

LEVEL 2

137

39%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

95

41%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

37

28%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

66

53%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

36

57%

LEVEL 2

21

33%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.