THOMAS JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

244

50%

LEVEL 2

155

32%

LEVEL 3

65

13%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

248

52%

LEVEL 2

143

30%

LEVEL 3

63

13%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

109

48%

LEVEL 2

69

30%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

110

47%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

135

51%

LEVEL 2

86

33%

LEVEL 3

32

12%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

138

56%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

14

32%

LEVEL 2

17

39%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

16

47%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

136

43%

LEVEL 2

110

34%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

65
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

135

44%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

48

16%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

85

77%

LEVEL 2

20

18%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

89

74%

LEVEL 2

20

17%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

181

42%

LEVEL 2

152

36%

LEVEL 3

65

15%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

183

45%

LEVEL 2

141

34%

LEVEL 3

63

15%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

63

95%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

65

97%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

93
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

182

43%

LEVEL 2

152

36%

LEVEL 3

65

15%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

87
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

182

44%

LEVEL 2

142

35%

LEVEL 3

63

15%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

62

95%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

66

99%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

41

29%

LEVEL 2

53

38%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

38

27%

LEVEL 2

54

39%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

203

58%

LEVEL 2

102

29%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

210

62%

LEVEL 2

89

26%

LEVEL 3

29

9%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.