Skip to Content
Main content

UNION SPRINGS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

97

24%

LEVEL 2

158

39%

LEVEL 3

106

26%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

89

30%

LEVEL 2

106

35%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

34

17%

LEVEL 2

84

42%

LEVEL 3

54

27%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

51

39%

LEVEL 3

33

25%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

63

31%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

63

37%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

91

24%

LEVEL 2

150

40%

LEVEL 3

101

27%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

79

29%

LEVEL 2

100

37%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

60

17%

LEVEL 2

152

42%

LEVEL 3

104

29%

LEVEL 4

42

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

54

21%

LEVEL 2

99

39%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

37

82%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

35

80%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

52

19%

LEVEL 2

102

38%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

40

22%

LEVEL 2

71

38%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

45

33%

LEVEL 2

56

41%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

49

43%

LEVEL 2

35

31%

LEVEL 3

21

18%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.