Skip to Content
Main content

CATTARAUGUS-LITTLE VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

146

39%

LEVEL 2

137

36%

LEVEL 3

73

19%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

122

36%

LEVEL 2

132

39%

LEVEL 3

60

18%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

56

31%

LEVEL 2

68

37%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

45

27%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

90

46%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

77

46%

LEVEL 2

67

40%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

138

38%

LEVEL 2

133

37%

LEVEL 3

70

19%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

79
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

113

35%

LEVEL 2

127

40%

LEVEL 3

57

18%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

80

27%

LEVEL 2

126

42%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

65

24%

LEVEL 2

122

45%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

66

85%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

57

85%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

51

28%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

37

23%

LEVEL 2

65

41%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

95

48%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

85

47%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.