WINDSOR CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 732

LEVEL 1

179

24%

LEVEL 2

334

46%

LEVEL 3

169

23%

LEVEL 4

50

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 679

LEVEL 1

143

21%

LEVEL 2

286

42%

LEVEL 3

182

27%

LEVEL 4

68

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

85

24%

LEVEL 2

169

47%

LEVEL 3

86

24%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

73

21%

LEVEL 2

142

41%

LEVEL 3

93

27%

LEVEL 4

42

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

94

25%

LEVEL 2

165

44%

LEVEL 3

83

22%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

70

21%

LEVEL 2

144

44%

LEVEL 3

89

27%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

205
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 680

LEVEL 1

164

24%

LEVEL 2

311

46%

LEVEL 3

158

23%

LEVEL 4

47

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

235
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 625

LEVEL 1

123

20%

LEVEL 2

267

43%

LEVEL 3

171

27%

LEVEL 4

64

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

10

67%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

114

18%

LEVEL 2

303

48%

LEVEL 3

163

26%

LEVEL 4

50

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 588

LEVEL 1

88

15%

LEVEL 2

257

44%

LEVEL 3

176

30%

LEVEL 4

67

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

65

64%

LEVEL 2

31

30%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

55

60%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

59

15%

LEVEL 2

172

45%

LEVEL 3

111

29%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

165
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

136

41%

LEVEL 3

113

34%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

120

35%

LEVEL 2

162

47%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

116

33%

LEVEL 2

150

43%

LEVEL 3

69

20%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.