WHITNEY POINT CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

271

42%

LEVEL 2

218

34%

LEVEL 3

131

20%

LEVEL 4

21

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

241

47%

LEVEL 2

159

31%

LEVEL 3

95

18%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

115

36%

LEVEL 2

112

35%

LEVEL 3

81

25%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

105

42%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

156

49%

LEVEL 2

106

33%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

136

52%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 621

LEVEL 1

261

42%

LEVEL 2

211

34%

LEVEL 3

128

21%

LEVEL 4

21

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

226

46%

LEVEL 2

157

32%

LEVEL 3

93

19%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

161

31%

LEVEL 2

213

41%

LEVEL 3

129

25%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

169

39%

LEVEL 2

152

35%

LEVEL 3

95

22%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

110

94%

LEVEL 2

5

4%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

72

91%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

83

29%

LEVEL 2

108

38%

LEVEL 3

81

28%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

69

38%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

188

53%

LEVEL 2

110

31%

LEVEL 3

50

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

195

58%

LEVEL 2

90

27%

LEVEL 3

42

13%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.