Skip to Content
Main content

MAINE-ENDWELL CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

385
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,084

LEVEL 1

296

27%

LEVEL 2

403

37%

LEVEL 3

287

26%

LEVEL 4

98

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

377
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 988

LEVEL 1

275

28%

LEVEL 2

336

34%

LEVEL 3

261

26%

LEVEL 4

116

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

221
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

115

21%

LEVEL 2

204

38%

LEVEL 3

156

29%

LEVEL 4

65

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

219
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

116

24%

LEVEL 2

158

32%

LEVEL 3

143

29%

LEVEL 4

76

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

164
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

181

33%

LEVEL 2

199

37%

LEVEL 3

131

24%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

158
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

159

32%

LEVEL 2

178

36%

LEVEL 3

118

24%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

11

69%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

369
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 999

LEVEL 1

260

26%

LEVEL 2

370

37%

LEVEL 3

272

27%

LEVEL 4

97

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

353
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 896

LEVEL 1

238

27%

LEVEL 2

305

34%

LEVEL 3

243

27%

LEVEL 4

110

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

16

53%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

13

52%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

11

39%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

374
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 875

LEVEL 1

132

15%

LEVEL 2

369

42%

LEVEL 3

278

32%

LEVEL 4

96

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

366
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 787

LEVEL 1

134

17%

LEVEL 2

287

36%

LEVEL 3

252

32%

LEVEL 4

114

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

164

78%

LEVEL 2

34

16%

LEVEL 3

9

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

141

70%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

9

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

316
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 689

LEVEL 1

121

18%

LEVEL 2

252

37%

LEVEL 3

226

33%

LEVEL 4

90

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

309
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 621

LEVEL 1

109

18%

LEVEL 2

203

33%

LEVEL 3

203

33%

LEVEL 4

106

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

175

44%

LEVEL 2

151

38%

LEVEL 3

61

15%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

166

45%

LEVEL 2

133

36%

LEVEL 3

58

16%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.