Skip to Content
Main content

HOMER BRINK SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

65

20%

LEVEL 2

112

35%

LEVEL 3

106

33%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

63

21%

LEVEL 2

117

39%

LEVEL 3

81

27%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

48

32%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

59

40%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

38

22%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

58

34%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

33

21%

LEVEL 2

58

38%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

53

18%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

100

34%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

117
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

55

20%

LEVEL 2

106

38%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

103

37%

LEVEL 3

100

36%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

100

39%

LEVEL 3

78

31%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

29

64%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

28

58%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

84

40%

LEVEL 4

33

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

71

36%

LEVEL 3

63

32%

LEVEL 4

38

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

41

37%

LEVEL 2

43

39%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

40

37%

LEVEL 2

46

43%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.