Skip to Content
Main content

RICHARD T STANK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

91

25%

LEVEL 2

170

46%

LEVEL 3

87

24%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

54

19%

LEVEL 2

137

47%

LEVEL 3

77

27%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

79

53%

LEVEL 3

32

22%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

63

51%

LEVEL 3

34

28%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

61

27%

LEVEL 2

91

41%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

39

23%

LEVEL 2

74

44%

LEVEL 3

43

26%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

96
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

81

24%

LEVEL 2

159

47%

LEVEL 3

74

22%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

125

47%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

61

19%

LEVEL 2

154

48%

LEVEL 3

86

27%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

122

48%

LEVEL 3

75

30%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

30

63%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

20

54%

LEVEL 2

15

41%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

42

18%

LEVEL 2

104

46%

LEVEL 3

62

27%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

84

46%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

49

35%

LEVEL 2

66

46%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

28

26%

LEVEL 2

53

50%

LEVEL 3

23

22%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.