VOORHEESVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

296
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

73

13%

LEVEL 2

183

33%

LEVEL 3

200

36%

LEVEL 4

96

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

48

11%

LEVEL 2

125

29%

LEVEL 3

154

36%

LEVEL 4

103

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

161
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

106

39%

LEVEL 4

55

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

59

26%

LEVEL 3

87

39%

LEVEL 4

63

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

135
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

103

36%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

40

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

11

58%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

10

63%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

270
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

66

13%

LEVEL 2

169

33%

LEVEL 3

183

36%

LEVEL 4

87

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

230
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

117

30%

LEVEL 3

139

36%

LEVEL 4

91

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

37

8%

LEVEL 2

158

33%

LEVEL 3

196

40%

LEVEL 4

95

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

27

7%

LEVEL 2

114

29%

LEVEL 3

148

38%

LEVEL 4

103

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

36

55%

LEVEL 2

25

38%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

21

55%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

282
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

58

12%

LEVEL 2

158

32%

LEVEL 3

187

38%

LEVEL 4

95

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

245
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

35

9%

LEVEL 2

115

29%

LEVEL 3

144

36%

LEVEL 4

101

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

15

28%

LEVEL 2

25

46%

LEVEL 3

13

24%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

13

37%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.