Skip to Content
Main content

LISHA KILL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 652

LEVEL 1

153

23%

LEVEL 2

292

45%

LEVEL 3

154

24%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

112

24%

LEVEL 2

174

37%

LEVEL 3

137

29%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

146

48%

LEVEL 3

76

25%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

43

18%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

82

35%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

104

30%

LEVEL 2

146

42%

LEVEL 3

78

22%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

69

30%

LEVEL 2

99

42%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

12

25%

LEVEL 4

12

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

16

33%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

162
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

109

22%

LEVEL 2

219

45%

LEVEL 3

126

26%

LEVEL 4

36

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

135
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

82

24%

LEVEL 2

122

36%

LEVEL 3

106

31%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

16

34%

LEVEL 2

24

51%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

8

26%

LEVEL 2

18

58%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

20

51%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

75

14%

LEVEL 2

270

49%

LEVEL 3

154

28%

LEVEL 4

53

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

162

40%

LEVEL 3

137

34%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

78

78%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

48

80%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

103

20%

LEVEL 2

227

45%

LEVEL 3

135

26%

LEVEL 4

45

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

67

19%

LEVEL 2

131

37%

LEVEL 3

115

33%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

50

35%

LEVEL 2

65

46%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

45

39%

LEVEL 2

43

37%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.