BRONX PREP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

129

40%

LEVEL 2

142

44%

LEVEL 3

46

14%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

179

41%

LEVEL 2

186

43%

LEVEL 3

53

12%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

64

36%

LEVEL 2

78

44%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

81

34%

LEVEL 2

107

45%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

65

45%

LEVEL 2

64

44%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

98

49%

LEVEL 2

79

40%

LEVEL 3

16

8%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

60

39%

LEVEL 2

68

44%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

86

38%

LEVEL 2

103

46%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

67

41%

LEVEL 2

71

44%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

93

45%

LEVEL 2

79

39%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

108

37%

LEVEL 2

135

46%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

131

35%

LEVEL 2

171

46%

LEVEL 3

52

14%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

21

72%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

48

75%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

51
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

106

36%

LEVEL 2

141

47%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

70
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

153

38%

LEVEL 2

183

45%

LEVEL 3

52

13%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

23

96%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

26

87%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

16

36%

LEVEL 2

20

44%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

13

30%

LEVEL 2

18

42%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

113

41%

LEVEL 2

122

44%

LEVEL 3

39

14%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

166

42%

LEVEL 2

168

43%

LEVEL 3

42

11%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.