Skip to Content
Main content

AKRON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

54

16%

LEVEL 2

130

38%

LEVEL 3

91

27%

LEVEL 4

67

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

44

20%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

67

30%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

51

30%

LEVEL 4

44

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

20

18%

LEVEL 2

37

32%

LEVEL 3

37

32%

LEVEL 4

20

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

36

21%

LEVEL 2

72

42%

LEVEL 3

40

23%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

24

23%

LEVEL 2

43

41%

LEVEL 3

30

28%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

9
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

12

29%

LEVEL 2

21

50%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

15

48%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

65

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

89
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

67

36%

LEVEL 3

60

33%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

120

39%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

67

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

30

15%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

22

69%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

14

74%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

88

37%

LEVEL 3

73

31%

LEVEL 4

54

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

21

15%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

52

37%

LEVEL 4

25

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

31

30%

LEVEL 2

42

40%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

23

29%

LEVEL 2

36

46%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.