Skip to Content
Main content

ROCKY POINT MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

109

27%

LEVEL 2

187

46%

LEVEL 3

78

19%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

39

27%

LEVEL 2

59

40%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

101

51%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

17

24%

LEVEL 2

33

46%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

64

31%

LEVEL 2

86

42%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

22

29%

LEVEL 2

26

34%

LEVEL 3

21

28%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

87

25%

LEVEL 2

164

47%

LEVEL 3

71

20%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

45
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

29

23%

LEVEL 2

50

40%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

15

43%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

52

16%

LEVEL 2

171

52%

LEVEL 3

75

23%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

53

42%

LEVEL 3

35

28%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

57

74%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

16

73%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

111
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

101

26%

LEVEL 2

184

46%

LEVEL 3

78

20%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

145

49%

LEVEL 3

67

23%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

21

20%

LEVEL 2

45

42%

LEVEL 3

30

28%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

54

49%

LEVEL 2

42

38%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

18

45%

LEVEL 2

14

35%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.