Skip to Content
Main content

CHARTER SCH-EDUC EXCELLENCE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

195

47%

LEVEL 3

123

30%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

52

13%

LEVEL 2

178

45%

LEVEL 3

128

32%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

31

14%

LEVEL 2

102

46%

LEVEL 3

69

31%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

89

44%

LEVEL 3

69

34%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

93

49%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

31

16%

LEVEL 2

89

46%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

90
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

116

48%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

100
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

94

45%

LEVEL 3

78

37%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

74

47%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

76

46%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

57

15%

LEVEL 2

185

48%

LEVEL 3

117

30%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

165

45%

LEVEL 3

123

34%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

152
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

59

15%

LEVEL 2

186

47%

LEVEL 3

123

31%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

162
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

40

11%

LEVEL 2

168

45%

LEVEL 3

125

34%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

9

64%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

12

48%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

31

49%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

31

50%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

54

16%

LEVEL 2

164

47%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

147

44%

LEVEL 3

108

32%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.