HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE PROMISE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

180

34%

LEVEL 2

228

44%

LEVEL 3

98

19%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

157

30%

LEVEL 2

247

47%

LEVEL 3

110

21%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

82

31%

LEVEL 2

124

46%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

68

26%

LEVEL 2

131

49%

LEVEL 3

58

22%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

98

38%

LEVEL 2

104

41%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

89

34%

LEVEL 2

116

44%

LEVEL 3

52

20%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

7

70%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

105
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

161

34%

LEVEL 2

208

44%

LEVEL 3

90

19%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

114
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

140

30%

LEVEL 2

212

45%

LEVEL 3

101

22%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

17

40%

LEVEL 2

18

43%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

15

33%

LEVEL 2

22

48%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

106

26%

LEVEL 2

202

49%

LEVEL 3

91

22%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

89

22%

LEVEL 2

212

52%

LEVEL 3

97

24%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

74

69%

LEVEL 2

26

24%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

68

58%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

114
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

172

34%

LEVEL 2

222

44%

LEVEL 3

98

19%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

125
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

152

29%

LEVEL 2

243

47%

LEVEL 3

110

21%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

29

38%

LEVEL 2

29

38%

LEVEL 3

16

21%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

16

20%

LEVEL 2

43

54%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

151

34%

LEVEL 2

199

45%

LEVEL 3

82

18%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

141

31%

LEVEL 2

204

45%

LEVEL 3

92

20%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.