Skip to Content
Main content

MOTT HALL II GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

125

39%

LEVEL 3

127

40%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

139

44%

LEVEL 4

51

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

61

35%

LEVEL 3

78

45%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

50

29%

LEVEL 3

84

48%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

64

45%

LEVEL 3

49

34%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

56

40%

LEVEL 3

55

39%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

11

44%

LEVEL 4

7

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

33

47%

LEVEL 4

20

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

22

26%

LEVEL 3

38

45%

LEVEL 4

23

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

46
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

31

38%

LEVEL 3

35

43%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

45
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

38

49%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

69

48%

LEVEL 3

52

36%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

52

44%

LEVEL 3

49

41%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

110

39%

LEVEL 3

121

43%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

89

32%

LEVEL 3

133

48%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

15

43%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

17

49%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

44

33%

LEVEL 3

58

43%

LEVEL 4

27

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

81

45%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

81

44%

LEVEL 3

69

38%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

51

39%

LEVEL 3

58

44%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.