Skip to Content
Main content

PS 254 ROSA PARKS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

40

13%

LEVEL 2

140

45%

LEVEL 3

97

31%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

127

47%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

66

45%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

56

47%

LEVEL 3

38

32%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

22

13%

LEVEL 2

74

45%

LEVEL 3

50

31%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

71

48%

LEVEL 3

46

31%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

19

45%

LEVEL 4

10

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

17

45%

LEVEL 3

16

42%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

12

48%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

108

50%

LEVEL 3

60

28%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

72
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

97

50%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

115

45%

LEVEL 3

88

34%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

106

46%

LEVEL 3

79

34%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

15

28%

LEVEL 2

25

47%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

10

26%

LEVEL 2

21

55%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

128
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

130

45%

LEVEL 3

96

33%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

108
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

120

47%

LEVEL 3

82

32%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

10

59%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

15

45%

LEVEL 3

12

36%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

15

39%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

125

45%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

28

12%

LEVEL 2

113

49%

LEVEL 3

69

30%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.