Skip to Content
Main content

URBAN SCIENCE ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

21
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

197

58%

LEVEL 2

119

35%

LEVEL 3

19

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

14
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

207

72%

LEVEL 2

67

23%

LEVEL 3

13

5%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

93

56%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

12

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

8
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

94

69%

LEVEL 2

34

25%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

8
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

104

61%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

113

74%

LEVEL 2

33

22%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

62

56%

LEVEL 2

44

40%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

61

69%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

133

60%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

16

7%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

143

74%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

19
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

138

51%

LEVEL 2

112

42%

LEVEL 3

17

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

13
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

158

68%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

12

5%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

59

87%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

49

89%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

20
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

102

43%

LEVEL 2

113

48%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

116

60%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

95

93%

LEVEL 2

6

6%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

91

96%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

47

82%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

160

69%

LEVEL 2

59

26%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.