Skip to Content
Main content

ANDERSON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

382
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

26

6%

LEVEL 3

108

26%

LEVEL 4

274

67%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

388
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

14

3%

LEVEL 3

98

24%

LEVEL 4

290

72%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

208
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

10

5%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

159

73%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

212
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

2%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

165

76%

MALE

PROFICIENT

174
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

16

8%

LEVEL 3

59

31%

LEVEL 4

115

61%

MALE

PROFICIENT

176
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

9

5%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

125

67%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

7

58%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

112
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

92

81%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

108
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

91

83%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

214
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

15

7%

LEVEL 3

60

26%

LEVEL 4

154

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

219
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

3%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

167

74%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

7

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

10

56%

LEVEL 4

6

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

17

45%

LEVEL 4

16

42%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

16

43%

LEVEL 4

19

51%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

348
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

20

5%

LEVEL 3

100

27%

LEVEL 4

248

67%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

354
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

3%

LEVEL 3

88

24%

LEVEL 4

266

73%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

26

63%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

24

62%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.