YORK EARLY COLLEGE ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

119

44%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

107

40%

LEVEL 3

95

35%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

70

47%

LEVEL 3

50

34%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

62

39%

LEVEL 3

58

37%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

14

12%

LEVEL 2

49

41%

LEVEL 3

36

30%

LEVEL 4

20

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

45

40%

LEVEL 3

37

33%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

11
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

38

44%

LEVEL 3

27

31%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

8

11%

LEVEL 2

28

37%

LEVEL 3

33

43%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

63
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

60

43%

LEVEL 3

46

33%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

59
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

19

15%

LEVEL 2

53

40%

LEVEL 3

40

31%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

110

45%

LEVEL 3

82

33%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

92

38%

LEVEL 3

92

38%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

15

56%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

128
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

105

40%

LEVEL 3

95

36%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

21

40%

LEVEL 3

20

38%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

19

42%

LEVEL 3

17

38%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

98

45%

LEVEL 3

66

31%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

31

14%

LEVEL 2

88

39%

LEVEL 3

78

35%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.