Skip to Content
Main content

MS OF MARKETING AND LEGAL STUDIES GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

21
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

145

52%

LEVEL 2

111

40%

LEVEL 3

15

5%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

37
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

94

41%

LEVEL 2

98

43%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

11
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

62

46%

LEVEL 2

62

46%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

40

36%

LEVEL 2

51

46%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

10
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

83

58%

LEVEL 2

49

35%

LEVEL 3

9

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

54

46%

LEVEL 2

47

40%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

139

53%

LEVEL 2

103

39%

LEVEL 3

15

6%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

85

40%

LEVEL 2

92

44%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

6

75%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

20
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

112

47%

LEVEL 2

104

44%

LEVEL 3

14

6%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

37
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

71

36%

LEVEL 2

90

45%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

33

80%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

23

74%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

21
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

133

51%

LEVEL 2

109

41%

LEVEL 3

15

6%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

37
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

82

38%

LEVEL 2

96

45%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

12

86%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

12

86%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

32

53%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

26

34%

LEVEL 2

34

45%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

113

52%

LEVEL 2

92

42%

LEVEL 3

7

3%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

68

44%

LEVEL 2

64

42%

LEVEL 3

19

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.