GASKILL PREPARATORY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

262

50%

LEVEL 2

184

35%

LEVEL 3

61

12%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

264

64%

LEVEL 2

102

25%

LEVEL 3

43

10%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

117

44%

LEVEL 2

109

41%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

107

53%

LEVEL 2

61

30%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

145

56%

LEVEL 2

75

29%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

157

74%

LEVEL 2

41

19%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

15

63%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

18

67%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

18

62%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

78

39%

LEVEL 2

83

42%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

76

54%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

137

58%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

22

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

142

71%

LEVEL 2

42

21%

LEVEL 3

15

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

14

45%

LEVEL 2

15

48%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

19

73%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

201

45%

LEVEL 2

175

39%

LEVEL 3

60

13%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

208

59%

LEVEL 2

96

27%

LEVEL 3

43

12%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

61

86%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

56

90%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

50

36%

LEVEL 2

54

39%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

51

48%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

212

55%

LEVEL 2

130

34%

LEVEL 3

34

9%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

213

69%

LEVEL 2

71

23%

LEVEL 3

25

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.