Skip to Content
Main content

BROOKLYN ASCEND CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

116

25%

LEVEL 2

210

46%

LEVEL 3

120

26%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

163

29%

LEVEL 2

240

42%

LEVEL 3

140

25%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

44

21%

LEVEL 2

92

44%

LEVEL 3

63

30%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

58

22%

LEVEL 2

107

41%

LEVEL 3

81

31%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

72

29%

LEVEL 2

118

47%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

105

34%

LEVEL 2

133

43%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

128
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

111

26%

LEVEL 2

196

45%

LEVEL 3

113

26%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

152
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

158

29%

LEVEL 2

228

42%

LEVEL 3

131

24%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

9

53%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

10

59%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

86

21%

LEVEL 2

190

47%

LEVEL 3

116

29%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

122

25%

LEVEL 2

213

43%

LEVEL 3

138

28%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

30

56%

LEVEL 2

20

37%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

41

59%

LEVEL 2

27

39%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

162
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

159

28%

LEVEL 2

239

43%

LEVEL 3

140

25%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

13

18%

LEVEL 2

29

39%

LEVEL 3

26

35%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

17

22%

LEVEL 2

31

40%

LEVEL 3

24

31%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

103

27%

LEVEL 2

181

47%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

146

30%

LEVEL 2

209

43%

LEVEL 3

116

24%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.