Skip to Content
Main content

BEDFORD STUY COLLEGIATE CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

67

24%

LEVEL 2

145

52%

LEVEL 3

60

21%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

105

35%

LEVEL 2

118

40%

LEVEL 3

63

21%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

78

53%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

38

25%

LEVEL 2

60

40%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

43

32%

LEVEL 2

67

50%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

67

46%

LEVEL 2

58

40%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

56
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

57

24%

LEVEL 2

126

53%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

57
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

82

35%

LEVEL 2

98

41%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

8

24%

LEVEL 2

16

48%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

20

43%

LEVEL 2

16

34%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

131

53%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

74

29%

LEVEL 2

110

44%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

17

53%

LEVEL 2

14

44%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

31

70%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

68
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

143

52%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

73
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

99

34%

LEVEL 2

115

40%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

30

65%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

20

29%

LEVEL 2

30

43%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

59

25%

LEVEL 2

115

49%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

85

37%

LEVEL 2

88

39%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.