BROWNSVILLE COLLEGIATE CHARTER SCH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

83

29%

LEVEL 2

132

46%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

96

32%

LEVEL 2

142

47%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

33

23%

LEVEL 2

67

47%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

41

25%

LEVEL 2

78

48%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

50

35%

LEVEL 2

65

46%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

55

39%

LEVEL 2

64

45%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

9

36%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

58
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

71

30%

LEVEL 2

109

46%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

46
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

73

33%

LEVEL 2

101

46%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

12

29%

LEVEL 2

19

45%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

12

23%

LEVEL 2

27

51%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

59

24%

LEVEL 2

119

49%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

71

27%

LEVEL 2

126

48%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

24

57%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

25

57%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

71
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

80

29%

LEVEL 2

129

46%

LEVEL 3

58

21%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

65
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

95

32%

LEVEL 2

137

46%

LEVEL 3

52

18%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

14

30%

LEVEL 2

16

35%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

16

31%

LEVEL 2

26

50%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

69

29%

LEVEL 2

116

48%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

80

32%

LEVEL 2

116

46%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.