Skip to Content
Main content

LEADERSHIP PREP OCEAN HILL CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

35

16%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

80

37%

LEVEL 4

38

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

49

15%

LEVEL 2

120

37%

LEVEL 3

122

37%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

28

28%

LEVEL 3

47

47%

LEVEL 4

14

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

26

15%

LEVEL 2

60

35%

LEVEL 3

72

42%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

23

20%

LEVEL 2

33

29%

LEVEL 3

33

29%

LEVEL 4

24

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

60

39%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

110
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

75

40%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

134
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

106

37%

LEVEL 3

105

37%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

53

28%

LEVEL 3

78

41%

LEVEL 4

37

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

104

36%

LEVEL 3

117

40%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

13

54%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

14

39%

LEVEL 2

16

44%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

18

53%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

25

45%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

33

18%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

62

34%

LEVEL 4

31

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

43

16%

LEVEL 2

102

38%

LEVEL 3

97

36%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.