Skip to Content
Main content

DR R IZQUIERDO HEALTH/SCIENCE CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

151

45%

LEVEL 2

152

45%

LEVEL 3

29

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

186

49%

LEVEL 2

159

42%

LEVEL 3

33

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

70

39%

LEVEL 2

88

49%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

81

43%

LEVEL 2

83

44%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

12
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

81

52%

LEVEL 2

64

41%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

105

54%

LEVEL 2

76

39%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

72

51%

LEVEL 2

56

40%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

95

44%

LEVEL 2

98

46%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

111

48%

LEVEL 2

99

42%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

129

43%

LEVEL 2

142

47%

LEVEL 3

27

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

140

44%

LEVEL 2

143

45%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

22

65%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

46

71%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

32
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

124

42%

LEVEL 2

142

48%

LEVEL 3

29

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

35
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

156

45%

LEVEL 2

153

44%

LEVEL 3

32

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

27

73%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

30

81%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

14

50%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

16

55%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

137

45%

LEVEL 2

140

46%

LEVEL 3

27

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

177

50%

LEVEL 2

143

41%

LEVEL 3

31

9%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.