ACAD-PERSONAL LDSHP AND EXCELLENCE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

23
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

191

53%

LEVEL 2

149

41%

LEVEL 3

18

5%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

186

50%

LEVEL 2

151

40%

LEVEL 3

36

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

10
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

79

48%

LEVEL 2

76

46%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

19
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

87

48%

LEVEL 2

75

41%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

112

57%

LEVEL 2

73

37%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

99

51%

LEVEL 2

76

39%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

31

53%

LEVEL 2

24

41%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

21

43%

LEVEL 2

21

43%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

149

52%

LEVEL 2

119

42%

LEVEL 3

13

5%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

158

51%

LEVEL 2

125

40%

LEVEL 3

26

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

22
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

137

47%

LEVEL 2

132

45%

LEVEL 3

18

6%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

135

47%

LEVEL 2

123

42%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

54

75%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

51

60%

LEVEL 2

28

33%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

18
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

109

46%

LEVEL 2

112

47%

LEVEL 3

15

6%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

36
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

102

40%

LEVEL 2

120

47%

LEVEL 3

34

13%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

82

66%

LEVEL 2

37

30%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

84

72%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

187

53%

LEVEL 2

144

41%

LEVEL 3

17

5%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

183

50%

LEVEL 2

147

40%

LEVEL 3

34

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.