Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL FOR FUTURE LEADERS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

28
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

30

34%

LEVEL 2

30

34%

LEVEL 3

27

31%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

64

39%

LEVEL 3

53

32%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

11
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

15

41%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

13

17%

LEVEL 2

30

39%

LEVEL 3

27

35%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

15

29%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

17

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

20

23%

LEVEL 2

34

39%

LEVEL 3

26

30%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

24

34%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

23

33%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

59
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

23

17%

LEVEL 2

55

40%

LEVEL 3

46

34%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

28
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

26

33%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

27

35%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

26

17%

LEVEL 2

58

39%

LEVEL 3

50

34%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

18
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

17

40%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

41
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

8

12%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

30

44%

LEVEL 4

11

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

23

50%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

27
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

25

26%

LEVEL 2

45

46%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

31

20%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.