Skip to Content
Main content

CENTRAL VALLEY CSD AT ILION-MOHAWK GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 983

LEVEL 1

383

39%

LEVEL 2

366

37%

LEVEL 3

170

17%

LEVEL 4

64

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 623

LEVEL 1

237

38%

LEVEL 2

232

37%

LEVEL 3

112

18%

LEVEL 4

42

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

163

34%

LEVEL 2

165

35%

LEVEL 3

109

23%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

91

29%

LEVEL 2

129

41%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

220

43%

LEVEL 2

201

40%

LEVEL 3

61

12%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

146

48%

LEVEL 2

103

34%

LEVEL 3

43

14%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

221
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 920

LEVEL 1

357

39%

LEVEL 2

342

37%

LEVEL 3

161

18%

LEVEL 4

60

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

227

39%

LEVEL 2

216

37%

LEVEL 3

106

18%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

16

39%

LEVEL 2

18

44%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

11

52%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 819

LEVEL 1

241

29%

LEVEL 2

346

42%

LEVEL 3

168

21%

LEVEL 4

64

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

146

28%

LEVEL 2

221

43%

LEVEL 3

111

21%

LEVEL 4

42

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

142

87%

LEVEL 2

20

12%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

91

88%

LEVEL 2

11

11%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

106

25%

LEVEL 2

160

38%

LEVEL 3

102

24%

LEVEL 4

51

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

74

29%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

67

27%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

277

49%

LEVEL 2

206

37%

LEVEL 3

68

12%

LEVEL 4

13

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

163

44%

LEVEL 2

149

40%

LEVEL 3

45

12%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.