Skip to Content
Main content

ERIE COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

11,384
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 39,137

LEVEL 1

15,431

39%

LEVEL 2

12,322

31%

LEVEL 3

7,792

20%

LEVEL 4

3,592

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,553
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 37,076

LEVEL 1

12,671

34%

LEVEL 2

11,852

32%

LEVEL 3

8,658

23%

LEVEL 4

3,895

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6,523
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,134

LEVEL 1

6,448

34%

LEVEL 2

6,163

32%

LEVEL 3

4,303

22%

LEVEL 4

2,220

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

7,208
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,159

LEVEL 1

5,174

28%

LEVEL 2

5,777

32%

LEVEL 3

4,806

26%

LEVEL 4

2,402

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,861
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,003

LEVEL 1

8,983

45%

LEVEL 2

6,159

31%

LEVEL 3

3,489

17%

LEVEL 4

1,372

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,345
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,917

LEVEL 1

7,497

40%

LEVEL 2

6,075

32%

LEVEL 3

3,852

20%

LEVEL 4

1,493

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

312
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,083

LEVEL 1

416

38%

LEVEL 2

355

33%

LEVEL 3

205

19%

LEVEL 4

107

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

388
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,142

LEVEL 1

390

34%

LEVEL 2

364

32%

LEVEL 3

269

24%

LEVEL 4

119

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

58
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

204

51%

LEVEL 2

135

34%

LEVEL 3

48

12%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

62
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

156

45%

LEVEL 2

128

37%

LEVEL 3

45

13%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

847
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,196

LEVEL 1

759

35%

LEVEL 2

590

27%

LEVEL 3

492

22%

LEVEL 4

355

16%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

980
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,277

LEVEL 1

684

30%

LEVEL 2

613

27%

LEVEL 3

566

25%

LEVEL 4

414

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8,725
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,594

LEVEL 1

5,432

25%

LEVEL 2

7,437

34%

LEVEL 3

5,895

27%

LEVEL 4

2,830

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9,122
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,078

LEVEL 1

4,344

22%

LEVEL 2

6,612

33%

LEVEL 3

6,142

31%

LEVEL 4

2,980

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

930
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,120

LEVEL 1

6,450

64%

LEVEL 2

2,740

27%

LEVEL 3

762

8%

LEVEL 4

168

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,328
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,411

LEVEL 1

5,145

55%

LEVEL 2

2,938

31%

LEVEL 3

1,104

12%

LEVEL 4

224

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

512
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,747

LEVEL 1

2,170

58%

LEVEL 2

1,065

28%

LEVEL 3

390

10%

LEVEL 4

122

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

673
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,822

LEVEL 1

1,952

51%

LEVEL 2

1,197

31%

LEVEL 3

532

14%

LEVEL 4

141

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

11,124
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 32,620

LEVEL 1

10,305

32%

LEVEL 2

11,191

34%

LEVEL 3

7,572

23%

LEVEL 4

3,552

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,254
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 31,040

LEVEL 1

8,123

26%

LEVEL 2

10,663

34%

LEVEL 3

8,407

27%

LEVEL 4

3,847

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

260
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,517

LEVEL 1

5,126

79%

LEVEL 2

1,131

17%

LEVEL 3

220

3%

LEVEL 4

40

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

299
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,036

LEVEL 1

4,548

75%

LEVEL 2

1,189

20%

LEVEL 3

251

4%

LEVEL 4

48

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11,332
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 37,007

LEVEL 1

13,631

37%

LEVEL 2

12,044

33%

LEVEL 3

7,749

21%

LEVEL 4

3,583

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12,513
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 34,840

LEVEL 1

10,816

31%

LEVEL 2

11,511

33%

LEVEL 3

8,621

25%

LEVEL 4

3,892

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

52
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,130

LEVEL 1

1,800

85%

LEVEL 2

278

13%

LEVEL 3

43

2%

LEVEL 4

9

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

40
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,236

LEVEL 1

1,855

83%

LEVEL 2

341

15%

LEVEL 3

37

2%

LEVEL 4

3

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8,501
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,518

LEVEL 1

3,983

22%

LEVEL 2

6,034

33%

LEVEL 3

5,543

30%

LEVEL 4

2,958

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8,868
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,328

LEVEL 1

3,059

18%

LEVEL 2

5,401

31%

LEVEL 3

5,750

33%

LEVEL 4

3,118

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,883
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,619

LEVEL 1

11,448

56%

LEVEL 2

6,288

30%

LEVEL 3

2,249

11%

LEVEL 4

634

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,685
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,748

LEVEL 1

9,612

49%

LEVEL 2

6,451

33%

LEVEL 3

2,908

15%

LEVEL 4

777

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.