LEWIS COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

472
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,734

LEVEL 1

609

35%

LEVEL 2

653

38%

LEVEL 3

344

20%

LEVEL 4

128

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

596
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,700

LEVEL 1

459

27%

LEVEL 2

645

38%

LEVEL 3

431

25%

LEVEL 4

165

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

289
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 851

LEVEL 1

249

29%

LEVEL 2

313

37%

LEVEL 3

200

24%

LEVEL 4

89

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

341
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 821

LEVEL 1

174

21%

LEVEL 2

306

37%

LEVEL 3

235

29%

LEVEL 4

106

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

183
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 883

LEVEL 1

360

41%

LEVEL 2

340

39%

LEVEL 3

144

16%

LEVEL 4

39

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

255
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 879

LEVEL 1

285

32%

LEVEL 2

339

39%

LEVEL 3

196

22%

LEVEL 4

59

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

452
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,660

LEVEL 1

582

35%

LEVEL 2

626

38%

LEVEL 3

327

20%

LEVEL 4

125

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

571
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,616

LEVEL 1

436

27%

LEVEL 2

609

38%

LEVEL 3

411

25%

LEVEL 4

160

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

7

26%

LEVEL 2

12

44%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

10

53%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

13

50%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

469
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,452

LEVEL 1

372

26%

LEVEL 2

611

42%

LEVEL 3

342

24%

LEVEL 4

127

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

591
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,427

LEVEL 1

240

17%

LEVEL 2

596

42%

LEVEL 3

426

30%

LEVEL 4

165

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

237

84%

LEVEL 2

42

15%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

219

80%

LEVEL 2

49

18%

LEVEL 3

5

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

304
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 795

LEVEL 1

211

27%

LEVEL 2

280

35%

LEVEL 3

213

27%

LEVEL 4

91

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

352
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 764

LEVEL 1

125

16%

LEVEL 2

287

38%

LEVEL 3

241

32%

LEVEL 4

111

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 939

LEVEL 1

398

42%

LEVEL 2

373

40%

LEVEL 3

131

14%

LEVEL 4

37

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

244
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 936

LEVEL 1

334

36%

LEVEL 2

358

38%

LEVEL 3

190

20%

LEVEL 4

54

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.