Skip to Content
Main content

RICHMOND COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,845
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,952

LEVEL 1

7,237

27%

LEVEL 2

9,870

37%

LEVEL 3

6,788

25%

LEVEL 4

3,057

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

11,639
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,874

LEVEL 1

5,914

22%

LEVEL 2

9,321

35%

LEVEL 3

7,823

29%

LEVEL 4

3,816

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,596
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,157

LEVEL 1

2,717

21%

LEVEL 2

4,844

37%

LEVEL 3

3,753

29%

LEVEL 4

1,843

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6,584
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,076

LEVEL 1

2,131

16%

LEVEL 2

4,361

33%

LEVEL 3

4,228

32%

LEVEL 4

2,356

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,249
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,795

LEVEL 1

4,520

33%

LEVEL 2

5,026

36%

LEVEL 3

3,035

22%

LEVEL 4

1,214

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,055
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,798

LEVEL 1

3,783

27%

LEVEL 2

4,960

36%

LEVEL 3

3,595

26%

LEVEL 4

1,460

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

69
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

48

23%

LEVEL 2

89

43%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

119
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

39
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

28

27%

LEVEL 2

38

36%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

46
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

27

23%

LEVEL 2

43

37%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

22

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,219
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,108

LEVEL 1

245

12%

LEVEL 2

644

31%

LEVEL 3

745

35%

LEVEL 4

474

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,374
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,123

LEVEL 1

186

9%

LEVEL 2

563

27%

LEVEL 3

805

38%

LEVEL 4

569

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6,251
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,596

LEVEL 1

2,491

18%

LEVEL 2

4,854

36%

LEVEL 3

4,173

31%

LEVEL 4

2,078

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7,002
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,145

LEVEL 1

1,851

14%

LEVEL 2

4,292

33%

LEVEL 3

4,532

34%

LEVEL 4

2,470

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

644
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,715

LEVEL 1

1,666

45%

LEVEL 2

1,405

38%

LEVEL 3

523

14%

LEVEL 4

121

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

884
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,725

LEVEL 1

1,418

38%

LEVEL 2

1,423

38%

LEVEL 3

673

18%

LEVEL 4

211

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,623
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,222

LEVEL 1

2,759

38%

LEVEL 2

2,840

39%

LEVEL 3

1,280

18%

LEVEL 4

343

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,214
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,494

LEVEL 1

2,370

32%

LEVEL 2

2,910

39%

LEVEL 3

1,704

23%

LEVEL 4

510

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,206
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,682

LEVEL 1

2,907

15%

LEVEL 2

7,569

38%

LEVEL 3

6,256

32%

LEVEL 4

2,950

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,774
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,559

LEVEL 1

2,033

10%

LEVEL 2

6,752

35%

LEVEL 3

7,076

36%

LEVEL 4

3,698

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

639
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,270

LEVEL 1

4,330

60%

LEVEL 2

2,301

32%

LEVEL 3

532

7%

LEVEL 4

107

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

865
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,315

LEVEL 1

3,881

53%

LEVEL 2

2,569

35%

LEVEL 3

747

10%

LEVEL 4

118

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9,803
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,677

LEVEL 1

6,326

25%

LEVEL 2

9,548

37%

LEVEL 3

6,750

26%

LEVEL 4

3,053

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11,595
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,613

LEVEL 1

5,047

20%

LEVEL 2

8,971

35%

LEVEL 3

7,781

30%

LEVEL 4

3,814

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

42
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,275

LEVEL 1

911

71%

LEVEL 2

322

25%

LEVEL 3

38

3%

LEVEL 4

4

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

44
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,261

LEVEL 1

867

69%

LEVEL 2

350

28%

LEVEL 3

42

3%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,789
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,476

LEVEL 1

1,791

16%

LEVEL 2

3,896

34%

LEVEL 3

3,741

33%

LEVEL 4

2,048

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,673
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,492

LEVEL 1

1,396

12%

LEVEL 2

3,423

30%

LEVEL 3

4,172

36%

LEVEL 4

2,501

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,056
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,476

LEVEL 1

5,446

35%

LEVEL 2

5,974

39%

LEVEL 3

3,047

20%

LEVEL 4

1,009

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,966
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,382

LEVEL 1

4,518

29%

LEVEL 2

5,898

38%

LEVEL 3

3,651

24%

LEVEL 4

1,315

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.