Skip to Content
Main content

YATES COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 755

LEVEL 1

343

45%

LEVEL 2

271

36%

LEVEL 3

117

15%

LEVEL 4

24

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 713

LEVEL 1

247

35%

LEVEL 2

287

40%

LEVEL 3

141

20%

LEVEL 4

38

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

146

39%

LEVEL 2

141

38%

LEVEL 3

71

19%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

98

28%

LEVEL 2

152

43%

LEVEL 3

74

21%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

197

52%

LEVEL 2

130

34%

LEVEL 3

46

12%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

149

41%

LEVEL 2

135

37%

LEVEL 3

67

19%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

128
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 695

LEVEL 1

315

45%

LEVEL 2

252

36%

LEVEL 3

105

15%

LEVEL 4

23

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

225

35%

LEVEL 2

267

41%

LEVEL 3

124

19%

LEVEL 4

35

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

15

42%

LEVEL 3

12

33%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 610

LEVEL 1

217

36%

LEVEL 2

254

42%

LEVEL 3

115

19%

LEVEL 4

24

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 577

LEVEL 1

144

25%

LEVEL 2

256

44%

LEVEL 3

139

24%

LEVEL 4

38

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

126

87%

LEVEL 2

17

12%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

103

76%

LEVEL 2

31

23%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

97

30%

LEVEL 2

129

40%

LEVEL 3

76

24%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

65

22%

LEVEL 2

127

43%

LEVEL 3

75

25%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

246

57%

LEVEL 2

142

33%

LEVEL 3

41

9%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

182

44%

LEVEL 2

160

38%

LEVEL 3

66

16%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.