EAST BLOOMFIELD CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

88

28%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

84

27%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

77

25%

LEVEL 2

118

38%

LEVEL 3

81

26%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

43

29%

LEVEL 2

53

35%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

31

22%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

45

32%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

45

27%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

46

27%

LEVEL 2

70

42%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

107
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

77

26%

LEVEL 2

107

37%

LEVEL 3

79

27%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

69

25%

LEVEL 2

110

39%

LEVEL 3

75

27%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

54

20%

LEVEL 2

107

39%

LEVEL 3

84

30%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

115

43%

LEVEL 3

79

30%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

34

87%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

39

89%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

75

36%

LEVEL 3

69

33%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

82

43%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

53

49%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

52

44%

LEVEL 2

36

30%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.