ALEXANDER CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

92

29%

LEVEL 2

132

42%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

85

27%

LEVEL 2

123

39%

LEVEL 3

78

25%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

72

44%

LEVEL 3

48

30%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

26

16%

LEVEL 2

64

40%

LEVEL 3

50

31%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

63

41%

LEVEL 2

60

39%

LEVEL 3

24

16%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

59

39%

LEVEL 2

59

39%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

89
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

86

29%

LEVEL 2

125

42%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

81

27%

LEVEL 2

118

39%

LEVEL 3

76

25%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

61

22%

LEVEL 2

127

45%

LEVEL 3

72

26%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

59

21%

LEVEL 2

117

42%

LEVEL 3

77

27%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

31

86%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

26

79%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

52

24%

LEVEL 2

93

42%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

43

21%

LEVEL 2

83

41%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

40

41%

LEVEL 2

39

40%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

42

38%

LEVEL 2

40

36%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.