Skip to Content
Main content

HONEOYE FALLS-LIMA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

345
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

109

17%

LEVEL 2

197

30%

LEVEL 3

243

37%

LEVEL 4

102

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

398
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 686

LEVEL 1

111

16%

LEVEL 2

177

26%

LEVEL 3

244

36%

LEVEL 4

154

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

190
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

83

27%

LEVEL 3

125

40%

LEVEL 4

65

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

204
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

85

26%

LEVEL 3

112

35%

LEVEL 4

92

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

155
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

72

21%

LEVEL 2

114

33%

LEVEL 3

118

35%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

194
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

79

22%

LEVEL 2

92

25%

LEVEL 3

132

36%

LEVEL 4

62

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

318
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

101

17%

LEVEL 2

179

30%

LEVEL 3

229

38%

LEVEL 4

89

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

366
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 625

LEVEL 1

97

16%

LEVEL 2

162

26%

LEVEL 3

227

36%

LEVEL 4

139

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

9

43%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

343
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 590

LEVEL 1

62

11%

LEVEL 2

185

31%

LEVEL 3

241

41%

LEVEL 4

102

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

394
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

57

9%

LEVEL 2

169

27%

LEVEL 3

241

39%

LEVEL 4

153

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

47

77%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

54

82%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

321
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

76

13%

LEVEL 2

173

30%

LEVEL 3

223

39%

LEVEL 4

98

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

366
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

71

12%

LEVEL 2

144

25%

LEVEL 3

219

38%

LEVEL 4

147

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

33

41%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

20

25%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

40

38%

LEVEL 2

33

31%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.