WILLIAMSON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

108

30%

LEVEL 2

141

39%

LEVEL 3

78

22%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

98

24%

LEVEL 2

161

40%

LEVEL 3

112

28%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

41

26%

LEVEL 2

58

37%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

35

20%

LEVEL 2

60

35%

LEVEL 3

55

32%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

67

33%

LEVEL 2

83

41%

LEVEL 3

40

20%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

63

27%

LEVEL 2

101

43%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

83

28%

LEVEL 2

115

38%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

133
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

75

22%

LEVEL 2

136

40%

LEVEL 3

99

29%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

14

44%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

134

45%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

46

14%

LEVEL 2

143

43%

LEVEL 3

112

33%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

53

85%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

52

74%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

37

19%

LEVEL 2

76

40%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

74

38%

LEVEL 3

70

36%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

71

42%

LEVEL 2

65

39%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

71

34%

LEVEL 2

87

41%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.