Skip to Content
Main content

THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

49

39%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

34

33%

LEVEL 3

52

51%

LEVEL 4

14

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

25

42%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

26

52%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

17

25%

LEVEL 2

22

32%

LEVEL 3

24

35%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

26

50%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

16

16%

LEVEL 2

29

29%

LEVEL 3

43

43%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

36

55%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

11

50%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

38

32%

LEVEL 3

49

41%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

33

29%

LEVEL 3

48

42%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

31

34%

LEVEL 3

46

51%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.