Skip to Content
Main content

ROSEMARIE ANN SIRAGUSA SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

100

36%

LEVEL 2

95

34%

LEVEL 3

54

19%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

91

31%

LEVEL 2

89

30%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

48

32%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

41

26%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

52

40%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

50

35%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

14

23%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

9

17%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

21

40%

LEVEL 4

12

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

19

40%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

27

48%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

62

41%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

49

30%

LEVEL 2

61

37%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

52

23%

LEVEL 2

92

41%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

36

15%

LEVEL 2

84

36%

LEVEL 3

79

34%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

48

89%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

55

86%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

81
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

82

33%

LEVEL 2

89

35%

LEVEL 3

52

21%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

115
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

72

27%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

80

30%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

18

69%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

19

59%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

12

20%

LEVEL 2

23

38%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

15

24%

LEVEL 3

22

35%

LEVEL 4

15

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

88

41%

LEVEL 2

72

33%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

81

34%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

60

26%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.