GEORGE M DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

92

31%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

84

28%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

74

25%

LEVEL 2

86

29%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

48

33%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

44

30%

LEVEL 2

37

25%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

44

29%

LEVEL 2

55

37%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

30

21%

LEVEL 2

49

34%

LEVEL 3

50

35%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

59

44%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

60

46%

LEVEL 4

26

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

30

53%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

27

44%

LEVEL 2

23

37%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

40

51%

LEVEL 2

29

37%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

31

40%

LEVEL 2

26

34%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

62

24%

LEVEL 2

86

33%

LEVEL 3

84

33%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

41

16%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

93

37%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

30

79%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

33

80%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

133
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

57

21%

LEVEL 2

85

31%

LEVEL 3

94

34%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

17

94%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

38

19%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

72

37%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

46

26%

LEVEL 3

78

43%

LEVEL 4

37

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

54

55%

LEVEL 2

31

32%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

55

49%

LEVEL 2

40

35%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.