Skip to Content
Main content

SEELY PLACE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

79

26%

LEVEL 3

132

44%

LEVEL 4

69

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

143

52%

LEVEL 4

61

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

30

21%

LEVEL 3

70

50%

LEVEL 4

35

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

27

22%

LEVEL 3

67

55%

LEVEL 4

27

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

62

39%

LEVEL 4

34

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

41

26%

LEVEL 3

76

49%

LEVEL 4

34

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

11

50%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

10

53%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

64
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

46

51%

LEVEL 4

18

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

86
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

63

62%

LEVEL 4

23

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

43

26%

LEVEL 3

67

40%

LEVEL 4

46

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

63

46%

LEVEL 4

30

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

68

24%

LEVEL 3

132

47%

LEVEL 4

68

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

59

23%

LEVEL 3

141

54%

LEVEL 4

60

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

11

52%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

9

60%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.