GANANDA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

95

28%

LEVEL 2

122

36%

LEVEL 3

87

26%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

73

22%

LEVEL 2

120

36%

LEVEL 3

100

30%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

32

18%

LEVEL 2

67

39%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

52

31%

LEVEL 4

32

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

63

38%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

49

30%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

75%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

112
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

74

25%

LEVEL 2

105

36%

LEVEL 3

80

27%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

58

21%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

85

30%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

16

67%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

71

23%

LEVEL 2

117

38%

LEVEL 3

85

28%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

50

17%

LEVEL 2

112

37%

LEVEL 3

98

33%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

24

77%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

23

70%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

95

39%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

36

15%

LEVEL 2

83

36%

LEVEL 3

80

34%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

51

53%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

37

37%

LEVEL 2

37

37%

LEVEL 3

20

20%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.