HUDSON FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 845

LEVEL 1

361

43%

LEVEL 2

312

37%

LEVEL 3

145

17%

LEVEL 4

27

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 788

LEVEL 1

299

38%

LEVEL 2

290

37%

LEVEL 3

166

21%

LEVEL 4

33

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

154

38%

LEVEL 2

154

38%

LEVEL 3

84

21%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

115

31%

LEVEL 2

146

39%

LEVEL 3

92

25%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

207

47%

LEVEL 2

158

36%

LEVEL 3

61

14%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

184

45%

LEVEL 2

144

35%

LEVEL 3

74

18%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

16

53%

LEVEL 2

13

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

10

31%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

164
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 768

LEVEL 1

319

42%

LEVEL 2

285

37%

LEVEL 3

138

18%

LEVEL 4

26

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

182
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 699

LEVEL 1

267

38%

LEVEL 2

250

36%

LEVEL 3

150

21%

LEVEL 4

32

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

19

63%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

16

38%

LEVEL 2

20

48%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 714

LEVEL 1

253

35%

LEVEL 2

290

41%

LEVEL 3

144

20%

LEVEL 4

27

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

169

27%

LEVEL 2

268

43%

LEVEL 3

160

25%

LEVEL 4

33

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

108

82%

LEVEL 2

22

17%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

130

82%

LEVEL 2

22

14%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

106

31%

LEVEL 2

137

39%

LEVEL 3

85

24%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

90

26%

LEVEL 2

139

40%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

255

51%

LEVEL 2

175

35%

LEVEL 3

60

12%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

209

48%

LEVEL 2

151

35%

LEVEL 3

70

16%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.