Skip to Content
Main content

GRANVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

181

39%

LEVEL 2

180

38%

LEVEL 3

85

18%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

141

32%

LEVEL 2

175

40%

LEVEL 3

96

22%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

68

31%

LEVEL 2

84

39%

LEVEL 3

49

23%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

58

28%

LEVEL 2

88

42%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

113

45%

LEVEL 2

96

38%

LEVEL 3

36

14%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

83

36%

LEVEL 2

87

38%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

174

39%

LEVEL 2

173

39%

LEVEL 3

80

18%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

116
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

131

31%

LEVEL 2

169

41%

LEVEL 3

90

22%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

92

26%

LEVEL 2

161

45%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

70

19%

LEVEL 2

166

46%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

89

81%

LEVEL 2

19

17%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

71

89%

LEVEL 2

9

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

53

26%

LEVEL 2

90

43%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

81

42%

LEVEL 3

62

32%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

128

49%

LEVEL 2

90

34%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

108

44%

LEVEL 2

94

38%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.