HIGHLAND CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

150

36%

LEVEL 2

155

37%

LEVEL 3

85

20%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

149

35%

LEVEL 2

146

34%

LEVEL 3

103

24%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

64

29%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

64

29%

LEVEL 2

78

35%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

86

42%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

85

41%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

13

37%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

9

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

89

32%

LEVEL 2

103

38%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

89
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

83

32%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

74

28%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

12

44%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

18

43%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

35

51%

LEVEL 2

25

36%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

39

54%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

107

29%

LEVEL 2

150

40%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

94

26%

LEVEL 2

139

38%

LEVEL 3

102

28%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

43

88%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

55

87%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

65

26%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

64

26%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

51

22%

LEVEL 2

84

36%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

85

49%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

98

51%

LEVEL 2

62

32%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.