Skip to Content
Main content

DRYDEN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

246

43%

LEVEL 2

198

35%

LEVEL 3

98

17%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

221

41%

LEVEL 2

193

36%

LEVEL 3

95

18%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

110

39%

LEVEL 2

104

37%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

91

35%

LEVEL 2

99

38%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

136

47%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

130

46%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

46

16%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

116
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

226

43%

LEVEL 2

185

35%

LEVEL 3

92

17%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

119
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

202

41%

LEVEL 2

172

35%

LEVEL 3

88

18%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

150

32%

LEVEL 2

193

41%

LEVEL 3

98

21%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

137

31%

LEVEL 2

185

41%

LEVEL 3

94

21%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

96

95%

LEVEL 2

5

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

84

90%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

69

24%

LEVEL 2

125

43%

LEVEL 3

72

25%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

67

25%

LEVEL 2

106

39%

LEVEL 3

72

26%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

177

63%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

26

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

154

57%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

23

9%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.